Michael Atkinson on Stateline
South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson appeared in a segment on South Australia’s Stateline last night, to discuss his opposition to an R18+ rating for games in Australia. He spent over 7 minutes detailing the same tired, old, and completely incorrect arguments against the introduction of this much-needed measure. You can watch this segment via YouTube, below:
While Mr. Atkinson is of course entitled to his opinions, what he demonstrated quite clearly in this interview with Stateline is that in his opinion he is the moral saviour of people everwhere in Australia, and that he has absolutely no qualms about forcing his antiquated moral code upon the country as a whole, and indeed believes he has the right – in fact the obligation – to do so.
“Attorneys-General years ago decided that there shouldn’t be an R18+ category for video games because they were interactive and they had higher impact than film or cinema, that it was difficult to prevent children accessing computer games in the home, and so for those reasons it was decided that Australia didn’t really need an R18+ category for computer games…”
Mr. Atkinson’s first comment that games are interactive and have a higher impact than film or cinema is another myth that opponents of video games like to trot out when asked about their position. The fact of the matter is that no study has ever shown conclusively that video games have any more influence on children than any other media, and no evidence exists anywhere to support this spurious claim.
He then goes on to say that it is difficult to prevent children accessing computer games in the home, another complete fabrication. All current generation consoles come with parental lock features, which give parents absolute control over what games their children can play, and when they can play them. It is no harder to prevent children accessing computer games than it is to make sure they can’t reach the knife drawer in the kitchen. The only difference is that while no retailer in their right mind would allow children to buy a set of kitchen knives, Michael Atkinson is quite happy with the current ratings system which allows children to purchase violent, adult titles that should by any measure of common sense be restricted to adults.
“I’m sure most people can distinguish the fantasy of a computer game from reality, but it’s the small number we know can’t that leads to mass murder in American high schools and in Thailand last year lead to a gamer playing out the fantasy of hijacking a taxicab and murdering the driver. It happened.”
Video games causing mass murder in American high schools? It is painfully clear that Mr. Atkinson hasn’t actually done his research. There are no known mass murders in American high schools that can be linked to video games. Infamous (and now permanently disbarred, for unbecoming conduct) lawyer Jack Thompson tried unsuccessfully in 2001 to sue several computer game companies on behalf of the parents of children killed in an American high school shooting. The case was of course dismissed immediately, with judges ruling that it was simply too far a leap of logic to try and blame video games for these crimes.
With regards to the murder of a cab driver in Thailand, Mr. Atkinson of course refers to the game Grand Theft Auto IV – a game that is currently available to children 15 and up here in Australia. In August this year, sales of GTA IV in Thailand were halted after a teenager confessed to robbing and murdering a taxi driver because he “wanted to see if it was as easy in real life as it was in the game”. Leaving aside for a minute the obviously deep mental problems this teenager has, and the fact that Michael Atkinson is 100% okay with this game currently being available to Australian children – the idea that we should ban violent video games entirely because of the actions of a few clearly troubled individuals is utterly over-reacting and ridiculous.
The real world is already filled with people trying to imitate the questionable actions of others. We still allow smoking, even though we know that all its effects are directly harmful to everyone, and it costs the country billions of dollars in healthcare and lost wages every year. It is completely ridiculous to prevent millions of mature, sensible people from enjoying a product simply because of the actions of a meagre handful of idiots. Michael Atkinson however, clearly believes that people, especially children in Australia should be allowed to be exposed to as much violent film, television and literature as they want. As long as it’s not a video game of course, because that would be bad.
“There was one version of Grand Theft Auto where a group of singing Hare Krishnas were run down on the pavement, by the gamer motorist, and points were scored for doing that…”
Grand Theft Auto IS a violent series. It’s always been a violent series. So why is Michael Atkinson completely unperturbed with it currently being on sale in Australia under an MA15+ rating? If Australia had an R18+ rating for games, Grand Theft Auto could have been placed behind the counter, out of view of children, and only provided to an adult who could produce valid ID. Instead of working to implement this mind-blowingly obvious solution however, Mr. Atkinson continues to wax hypocritical about the horrors of Grand Theft Auto and why children shouldn’t be playing it. Clearly when your moral high horse is as towering as Mr. Atkinsons, it must be difficult to remain in touch with common sense.
“I think the western, industrialised countries that allow R18+ computer games and the extreme violence that goes with them are just so many gadarene swine going over the cliff, and I’m pleased that Australia has a principled, sensible stand against this extreme violence, I’m happy to stand alone, and international gamers can laugh at us all they like.”
And here we come to the crux of the issue: Michael Atkinson believes that he is the last remaining bastion of hope for the morals of Australia. He looks around at other countries, seeing a slide into moral decay, violence and corruption, and decides to take a stand against it all… by censoring video games. Yes, video games, that pervasive force responsible for all the evil and destruction in the western world. Australians should count ourselves lucky that this man is willing to stand up and fight for what is right, even if he has to run roughshod over common sense and freedom of speech in the process.
The monstrous arrogance of this man is to be utterly condemned by Australians everywhere. This man who sits idly by and allows children – HIS children – to play violent MA15+ titles, while loudly defending his decision not to restrict their sale to adults as being “in the best interests of children”, this man who is happy to impose his completely nonsensical moral code upon the entirety of Australia, this man who can’t even begin to comprehend his own hypocrisy, this man is an arrogant menace and needs to be immediately removed from office. Australians everywhere should outraged that Michael Atkinson thinks they are so stupid, so decadent as to need his condescending protection against the evils of the world.
Don’t stand for this. Get involved. Write to your local MP, write to your state’s Attorney-General and put the pressure on. As long as this man continues to hold veto power over change in Australia, children will still be playing violent games, people of all ages will still be treated like ignorant children, and the system will still be broken, unfair and dangerous.
(link)
Tom says:
WTF is it with aussie politicians riding on the high horse of morality.
(One look at this guy and its obvious he would break everyone moral for a bit of sexual deviancy or a cash benefits.
We all know what politicians are really like!)
I’m getting really sick of Australia becoming a nanny state, water filtering, internet filtering, and of course this issue….. whats next? its stuff like this that causes mental disorders if you ask me!
Actually what really sickens me is that every single time they pull out the “think of the children” card. When it is blatently obvious that it is not doing anything to protect the children!
E.G.
In Fallout 3 I walk around and blow everyone head apart in any manner I want. Yet the games is MA15, meaning children can access it.
But if drugs are in it “oh no, ban it” – if you ask me thats lunacy.
YOU ARE NOT PROTECTING THE CHILDREN YOU IDIOTS! MERELY USING THIS EXCUSE AS A WAY OF FORCING THIS ONE SIZE FITS ALL BS ON US.
What ever happened to parents looking after their children, and being responsible for their actions – EDUCATION NOT CENSORSHIP.
Excellent article, when you break down its apparant that he has no idea what he is talking about, and yet he’s nice enough to force this on all of us.
There are so many holes and things that just don’t make any sense in this system, its hard to believe its actually true!
(link)
Tom says:
I guess it is the same old story
What right does the goverment(which is simply a body of people, not some miraculous being from outer space) to tell me how to raise my children, or what I can and can’t watch.
BTW 22 years + of gaming and I’m yet to massarce anyone
(link)
Mark Limburg says:
We have to stand up to this sort of insanity. When one man can hold a strangle hold on debate and rational analysis, where his opinion is enforced through fear, uncertainly and doubt, when our own processes of government are stalled by some non-existant “veto” power .. it’s wrong.
Mr Atkinson’s opinion has allowed kids to legally purchase and play Fallout3 at M15, which is rated R18 in the UK. Just how is this protecting kids?
The whole thing is a farce, and we need to make *ALL* politians aware of the facts and study. Make them aware that not only is this about gaming, it’s about an abuse of power.
There are plenty of resources on this site to help us in this fight. Please, please use them. Write to your local MP, state or federal. It doesn’t matter if this is focused on a South Australian MP, this affects every single person in Australia.
If we don’t stop this, we deserve the laws we are “given”.
(link)
TBoneTony says:
Here is something that I feel what will happen if there is an R18+ rating in Australia.
1. Us Aussie Gamers are still going have to put up with these family groups not liking the R18+ rating and they will still try to call for banning some games even though they have not played them at all.
2. The games we get are games from America that are at the higher end of the M17+ rating from the ESRB being refitted into the OFLC’s R18+. And there are only a small number of games, even though they are significant like Madworld for example, that will be just a minor change but something that will be really good for us Australian Gamers an the Games Industry in Australia not having to worry about the OFLC refusing the classification of our home grown games that appeal for the higher and mature (as in M17+ in American Standards) adult audience.
3. There will be NO GAMES that EVER contain RAPE or Sex scenes that go into Pornographic material. As in they will never reach the kind of material that you will find in an R18+ movie and NEVER the kind of content that is seen in an X rated movie.
4. Even if we go on TV and plainly state that no 2 and 3 of what I have been saying, those family groups will still say their fears and opinions based on their own inexperience of not playing Videogames and they will call us Gamers as savage immoral people for playing games like that.
There will still be some Politicians will have a field day with us even if we do have an R18+ rating.
But if we do have an R18+ rating for Videogames and we can still chose to buy games that are given an R18+ rating, that would be allot more easier for us than to live in a society that does not have an R18+ rating that treats us like kids.
TBoneTony
(link)
Matt says:
“I think the western, industrialised countries that allow R18+ computer games and the extreme violence that goes with them are just so many (?) swine going over the cliff…”
What, like New Zealand?
(link)
Glenn A. says:
I believe, (And I speak for most of my viewers) that Mr Atkinson should respect the views of the community and either Step Down as Attorney General or have his veto powers stripped.
This ridiculous charade Mr Atkinson is on must end, it is either going to end in 1 of 3 ways,
• When Mr Atkinson Steps down or Retires.
• If My Atkinson’s Veto Powers are stripped.
• When Mr Atkinson is removed from office.
The Australian Population has the right to decide for it’s self as to what game ratings we should allow into our country, NOT Mr Atkinson!
To Mr Atkinson;
In response to your concern for your children, perhaps you should learn how to moderate your kids use of the computer, and just not let them play these games.
PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE GROUND MR ATKINSON! Australia wants to have the FREEDOM OF CHOICE as to what games we want in our country!
(link)
jim says:
Mr. Atkinson’s logic is so flawed. The fact that he blocks a R-18 rating is actually allowing the violent games he dislikes into the hands of the children he wants to “protect” more easily. He really should not use GTA as an example of why Australia should not have the more mature classification when it’s that lack of a classification that allows even younger kids to be exposed to it. A stronger rating would allow for stronger regulations of the sale of said product, and prevent younger children from buying.
(link)
Greg Barila says:
HGi there, I’ve written a long discussion piece on this issue I thought you might find interesting. It’d be great if you could leave your thoughts and comments on the story. Regards
http://eastern-courier-messenger.whereilive.com.au/news/story/outlook-violent-argument/
(link)
R18+ Games Australia » Blog Archive » Michael Atkinson Explains says:
[...] we haven’t seen before of course, but it’s not unusual for politicians as detached as Mr. Atkinson to rehash old [...]