<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Updates: Case Studies (And Banners)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/site-updates-case-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/site-updates-case-studies/</link>
	<description>Australia needs an R18+ rating for video games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/site-updates-case-studies/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.r18games.com.au/?p=172#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Ben, and for letting me know. I&#039;ll edit the GTA IV case study momentarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Ben, and for letting me know. I&#8217;ll edit the GTA IV case study momentarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/site-updates-case-studies/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.r18games.com.au/?p=172#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Great website, good to see someone is trying to do something about this issue.

However, your case study on GTA IV states that it was initially refused classification, which is incorrect. Rockstar self-censored the game and only ever submitted an edited version. I felt that this was a great disservice to Australian gamers, since all of the violent content that was removed has appeared in other games that were not banned or edited released both before and since GTA IV. Rockstar submitted the game in December, which would have given them plenty of time to make any requested edits before the April release date, but it seems they were more concerned about saving a couple of thousand dollars not having to resubmit the game if anything was objected to than give Australian gamers the closest version the expeience as it was originally intended.

Anyway, I&#039;ve rambled on enough, keep fighting the good fight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great website, good to see someone is trying to do something about this issue.</p>
<p>However, your case study on GTA IV states that it was initially refused classification, which is incorrect. Rockstar self-censored the game and only ever submitted an edited version. I felt that this was a great disservice to Australian gamers, since all of the violent content that was removed has appeared in other games that were not banned or edited released both before and since GTA IV. Rockstar submitted the game in December, which would have given them plenty of time to make any requested edits before the April release date, but it seems they were more concerned about saving a couple of thousand dollars not having to resubmit the game if anything was objected to than give Australian gamers the closest version the expeience as it was originally intended.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve rambled on enough, keep fighting the good fight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

