Aliens vs. Predator Classified MA15+
SEGA have won their appeal today against the RC rating given to the upcoming game Aliens vs. Predator, meaning that the game now has an MA15+ rating and will be available, unedited, in February. The reasons for the decision are as follows:
A three-member panel of the Classification Review Board (the Review Board) has unanimously determined that the computer game Aliens vs Predator is classified MA 15+ with the consumer advice ‘Strong science fiction violence’.
In the Review Board’s opinion the violence depicted in the game can be accommodated within the MA 15+ category as the violent scenes are not prolonged and are interspersed with longer non violent sequences. The violence is fantastical in nature and justified by the context of the game, set in a futuristic science-fiction world, inhabited by aliens and predators. This context serves to lessen its impact. The more contentious violence is randomly generated and is not dependent on player selection of specific moves.
Although this looks like a win for gamers, it clearly means that the game will be available to 15 year olds, despite the game specifically targeted at adults.
This is the same Review Board which previously refused to overturn the ban on Left 4 Dead 2. Their reasons for Refusing Classification to an uncensored L4D2 were that the game featured:
- Realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence
- Insufficient delineation between the depiction of general zombie figures and the human figures
- Close-in attacks that cause copious amounts of blood spray and splatter, decapitations and limb dismemberment as well as locational damage where contact is made to the enemy which may reveal skeletal bits and gore
And yet only a month later, the Review Board has granted an MA15+ rating to a game which, according to the Classification Board, features:
…close-up depictions of human characters being subjected to various types of violence, including explicit decapitation and dismemberment as well as locational damage such as stabbing through the chest, throat, mouth or eyes. Characters can be stabbed with a Predator’s wrist blade or an Alien’s tail in depictions reminiscent of impalement.
The Predator collects “trophies” by explicitly ripping off human heads, their spinal columns dangling from severed necks. Heads can be completely twisted around in order to break a character’s neck. Eyes can be stabbed through or gouged out, leaving empty, bloodied eye sockets. It is noted that a player is able to combine manoeuvres together in quick succession, which further increases impact; for example, a Predator can stab a character through both eyes with its wrist blades and then rip off their head, with spinal column still attached. Extensive post-mortem damage, including decapitation and dismemberment, is also possible.
Depictions of violence such as the above are accompanied by copious amounts of blood and gore, including ample wound detail and visible skeleton.
So, according our Federal ratings body, it is okay to perform gratuitous violence displayed in graphic detail upon realistically depicted humans, but it is not okay to perform the same sort of violence upon mindless zombies who just happen to look like humans.
With this sort of constant inconsistency surrounding what is and isn’t appropriate for an MA15+ rating, it is more important than ever that Australia joins the rest of the world in having an R18+ rating for video games.
Make your submission today to the discussion paper and help bring about this change as soon as possible.



(link)
Matt says:
A victory, albeit a slightly hollow one. It doesn’t fix the problem, merely highlights yet again the problems with the system.
I wonder if Atkinson is planning to appeal this one, too? (Not that he can actually appeal the decisions without going through the Federal Attorney-General…)
(link)
Glenn says:
Indeed. If an R18+ for video games existed in Australia, then AvP would be restricted to adults.
This is exactly what happened with F.E.A.R. 2.
(link)
Carl Wilson says:
This is exactly why we need an R18 rating for video games in Australia.
Do you think this would have passed had the publishers decided to simply edit the game?
Due to overwhelming demand in Australia and the appeal and refusal by the publihser to edit… The classification board HAD to find a way to have it rated MA.
This unfortunately is the fuel both sides of the argument for R18 games will use. Depends who uses it better.
I SUPPORT R18 GAMES IN AUSTRALIA! Get it behind it people.
(link)
Glenn says:
Matt: “I wonder if Atkinson is planning to appeal this one, too? (Not that he can actually appeal the decisions without going through the Federal Attorney-General…)”
I doubt that. Ratkinson has been bragging to gaming sites last month how he planned to appeal MW2’s MA15+ rating, and it never happened.
(link)
Bret says:
i am sick of games getting band so i have been buying games from overseas off ebay i bought an uncensored copy of Left 4 dead 2 for only $56.00 cheaper than what it is in Australia.
(link)
Bret says:
If i am to buy game from Australia again the will have to be uncensored because it is treating Australian adults like children not giving them an 18 rating