<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>R18+ Games Australia &#187; stateline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.r18games.com.au/tag/stateline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.r18games.com.au</link>
	<description>Australia needs an R18+ rating for video games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Michael Atkinson on Stateline</title>
		<link>http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/michael-atkinson-on-stateline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/michael-atkinson-on-stateline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys-general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael atkinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stateline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.r18games.com.au/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson appeared in a segment on South Australia&#8217;s Stateline last night, to discuss his opposition to an R18+ rating for games in Australia. He spent over 7 minutes detailing the same tired, old, and completely incorrect arguments against the introduction of this much-needed measure. You can watch this segment via YouTube, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson appeared in a segment on <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/stateline/sa/">South Australia&#8217;s <em>Stateline</em></a> last night, to discuss his opposition to an R18+ rating for games in Australia. He spent over 7 minutes detailing the same tired, old, and completely incorrect arguments against the introduction of this much-needed measure. You can watch this segment via YouTube, below:</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ebe9BEe024U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ebe9BEe024U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>While Mr. Atkinson is of course entitled to his opinions, what he demonstrated quite clearly in this interview with <i>Stateline</i> is that in his opinion he is the moral saviour of people everwhere in Australia, and that he has absolutely no qualms about forcing his antiquated moral code upon the country as a whole, and indeed believes he has the right &#8211; in fact the obligation &#8211; to do so.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Attorneys-General years ago decided that there shouldn&#8217;t be an R18+ category for video games because they were interactive and they had higher impact than film or cinema, that it was difficult to prevent children accessing computer games in the home, and so for those reasons it was decided that Australia didn&#8217;t really need an R18+ category for computer games&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Atkinson&#8217;s first comment that games are interactive and have a higher impact than film or cinema is another myth that opponents of video games like to trot out when asked about their position. The fact of the matter is that <b>no study has ever shown conclusively that video games have any more influence on children than any other media</b>, and no evidence exists <b>anywhere</b> to support this spurious claim.</p>
<p>He then goes on to say that it is difficult to prevent children accessing computer games in the home, another <b>complete fabrication</b>. All current generation consoles come with <b>parental lock features</b>, which give parents absolute control over what games their children can play, and when they can play them. It is no harder to prevent children accessing computer games than it is to make sure they can&#8217;t reach the knife drawer in the kitchen. The only difference is that while no retailer in their right mind would allow children to buy a set of kitchen knives, Michael Atkinson is quite happy with the current ratings system which <a href="http://www.r18games.com.au/why">allows children to purchase violent, adult titles</a> that should by any measure of common sense be restricted to adults.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m sure most people can distinguish the fantasy of a computer game from reality, but it&#8217;s the small number we know can&#8217;t that leads to mass murder in American high schools and in Thailand last year lead to a gamer playing out the fantasy of hijacking a taxicab and murdering the driver. It happened.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Video games causing mass murder in American high schools? It is painfully clear that Mr. Atkinson hasn&#8217;t actually done his research. There are no known mass murders in American high schools that can be linked to video games. Infamous (and now permanently disbarred, for unbecoming conduct) lawyer Jack Thompson tried unsuccessfully in 2001 to sue several computer game companies on behalf of the parents of children killed in an American high school shooting. The case was of course dismissed immediately, with judges ruling that it was simply too far a leap of logic to try and blame video games for these crimes. </p>
<p>With regards to the murder of a cab driver in Thailand, Mr. Atkinson of course refers to the game <i>Grand Theft Auto IV</i> &#8211; a game that is currently available to children 15 and up here in Australia. In August this year, sales of <i>GTA IV</i> in Thailand were halted after a teenager confessed to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSBKK22888820080804?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews&#038;pageNumber=1&#038;virtualBrandChannel=0">robbing and murdering a taxi driver</a> because he &#8220;wanted to see if it was as easy in real life as it was in the game&#8221;. Leaving aside for a minute the obviously deep mental problems this teenager has, and the fact that Michael Atkinson is <b>100% okay with this game currently being available to Australian children</b> &#8211; the idea that we should ban violent video games entirely because of the actions of a few clearly <i>troubled</i> individuals is utterly over-reacting and ridiculous.</p>
<p>The real world is already filled with people trying to imitate the questionable actions of others. We still allow smoking, even though we know that all its effects are directly harmful to everyone, and it costs the country billions of dollars in healthcare and lost wages every year. It is completely ridiculous to prevent millions of mature, sensible people from enjoying a product simply because of the actions of a meagre handful of idiots. Michael Atkinson however, clearly believes that people, especially children in Australia should be allowed to be exposed to as much violent film, television and literature as they want. As long as it&#8217;s not a video game of course, because that would be <i>bad</i>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There was one version of <em>Grand Theft Auto</em> where a group of singing Hare Krishnas were run down on the pavement, by the gamer motorist, and points were scored for doing that&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Grand Theft Auto</em> <b>IS</b> a violent series. It&#8217;s <em>always</em> been a violent series. So why is Michael Atkinson completely unperturbed with it currently being on sale in Australia under an MA15+ rating? If Australia had an R18+ rating for games, <em>Grand Theft Auto</em> could have been placed behind the counter, out of view of children, and only provided to an adult who could produce valid ID. Instead of working to implement this <b>mind-blowingly obvious solution</b> however, Mr. Atkinson continues to wax hypocritical about the horrors of <em>Grand Theft Auto</em> and why children shouldn&#8217;t be playing it. Clearly when your moral high horse is as towering as Mr. Atkinsons, it must be difficult to remain in touch with common sense.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think the western, industrialised countries that allow R18+ computer games and the extreme violence that goes with them are just so many gadarene swine going over the cliff, and I&#8217;m pleased that Australia has a principled, sensible stand against this extreme violence, I&#8217;m happy to stand alone, and international gamers can laugh at us all they like.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And here we come to the crux of the issue: Michael Atkinson believes that he is the last remaining bastion of hope for the morals of Australia. He looks around at other countries, seeing a slide into moral decay, violence and corruption, and decides to take a stand against it all&#8230; <em>by censoring video games</em>. Yes, video games, that pervasive force responsible for all the evil and destruction in the western world. Australians should count ourselves lucky that this man is willing to stand up and fight for what is right, even if he has to run roughshod over common sense and freedom of speech in the process.</p>
<p>The monstrous arrogance of this man is to be utterly condemned by Australians everywhere. This man who sits idly by and allows children &#8211; HIS children &#8211; to play violent MA15+ titles, while loudly defending his decision <strong>not to restrict their sale to adults</strong> as being &#8220;in the best interests of children&#8221;, this man who is happy to impose his <b>completely nonsensical moral code</b> upon the entirety of Australia, this man who can&#8217;t even begin to comprehend his own hypocrisy, this man is an arrogant menace and needs to be immediately removed from office. Australians everywhere should <em>outraged</em> that Michael Atkinson thinks they are so stupid, so decadent as to need his condescending protection against the evils of the world.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t stand for this. Get involved. Write to your local MP, write to your state&#8217;s Attorney-General and <em>put the pressure on</em>. As long as this man continues to hold veto power over change in Australia, children will still be playing violent games, people of all ages will still be treated like ignorant children, and <b>the system will still be broken, unfair and dangerous</b>.</p>
<p class="meta">Thanks to <b>MrWyld</b> for the YouTube video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.r18games.com.au/2008/11/michael-atkinson-on-stateline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
